Color-Blind Affirmative Action
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a conceptual framework for understanding the consequences of the widespread adoption of “race-neutral alternatives” to conventional racial affirmative action policies in college admissions. A simple model of applicant competition with endogenous effort is utilized to show that, in comparison to color-conscious affirmative action, these color-blind alternatives can significantly lower the efficiency of the student selection process in equilibrium. We examine data on matriculates at several selective colleges and universities to estimate the magnitudes involved. It is shown that the short-run efficiency losses of implementing color-blind affirmative action (in our sample) are four to five times as high as color-conscious affirmative action. ∗We are grateful to Lawrence Katz, Kevin Lang, Steven Levitt, and Debraj Ray for helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank seminar participants at Boston University, Cornell, MacArthur’s Social Interactions and Inequality Network, and New York University. Fryer is at the Harvard Society of Fellows and NBER, Littauer Center, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138 (e-mail: [email protected]); Loury is at the Department of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Boston MA 02215 (e-mail [email protected]); and Yuret is at the Department of Economics, Boston University (e-mail: [email protected]). Financial support is gratefully acknowledged from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation.
منابع مشابه
Theories of Statistical Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Survey*
This chapter surveys the theoretical literature on statistical discrimination and affirmative action. This literature suggests different explanations for the existence and persistence of group inequality. This survey highlights such differences and describes in these contexts the effects of color-sighted and color-blind affirmative action policies, and the efficiency implications of discriminat...
متن کاملAffirmative Action in Winner-Take-All Markets∗
Whom to hire, promote, admit into elite universities, elect, or issue government contracts to are all determined in a tournament-like (winner-take-all) structure. This paper constructs a simple model of pair-wise tournament competition to investigate affirmative action in these markets. We consider two forms of affirmative action: group-sighted, where employers are allowed to use group identity...
متن کاملOn Disguises, Tokens, and Affirmative Action Policies
In Brilliant Disguise: An Empirical Analysis of a Social Experiment Banning Affirmative Action, Professor Deirdre Bowen provides a valuable service by undertaking an empirical assessment of the accuracy of some predictions associated with affirmative action bans. Her analysis suggests that minority students attending schools using affirmative action programs feel better about themselves and the...
متن کاملThe (Un)Level Playing Field: How Color-Blind Educational Tracking Leads to Unequal Access
Educational tracking seeks to group students by unobserved ability using measures of observable acquired skills. In a model where individuals have differential skills prior to beginning formal education due to differences in early childhood development (e.g. linguistic, cultural, or nutritional disadvantages), we show that color-blind tracking systematically underplaces minorities. As a result,...
متن کاملColor-Blind Affirmative Action and Student Quality
This paper assesses the extent to which schools in the University of California (UC) system were able to restore racial diversity among admitted students using race-neutral polices after California’s ban on racebased affirmative action. Using administrative data from the UC from before and after the ban on racecontingent admissions policies, we present evidence that UC campuses changed the weig...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003